WebRIFKIND v. SUPERIOR COURT OPINION FILES, P.J. This original proceeding was brought here to review an order of the superior court made in a marriage dissolution proceeding, requiring petitioner (Husband) to produce documents and records which he says are irrelevant and privileged or confidential. WebFeb 23, 1994 · Mr. Rifkind also refused to answer a question that he believed would lead to a breach of attorney-client confidences between himself and the woman he and Mr. Good had represented.
Did you know?
Because of the limited nature of the issues before us, it is not necessary to set out a detailed account of the underlying litigation, or the litigation out of which it, in turn, arose. Instead, we provide the following synopsis, related to the contention questions issue, reserving a fuller exposition of facts especially pertinent to … See more We emphasize at the outset what we are not discussing: questions at a deposition asking the person deposed about the basis for, or information about, a factual … See more Let an order issue, mandating the respondent court to vacate and set aside its order of June 8, 1993, directing petitioner to answer further questions at deposition … See more WebOct 10, 2024 · Rifkind v. Superior Court (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1255, 1259. The following are examples of legal contentions: “Do you contend X's conduct was negligent (legal conclusion)?” . . . “If you do, state all facts, list all witnesses, and identify and describe all documents that support your contention that X was negligent.”
Web2 days ago · It is difficult to prove libel in the American legal system, thanks in large part to New York Times v. Sullivan, the 1964 Supreme Court decision that is considered as critical to the First ... WebRifkind v. Superior Court, 22 Cal. App. 4th 1255 (1994): Argued successfully, and established precedent of widespread use that “contention” deposition questions are improper.
WebSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3748-21 GOLD TREE SPA, INC., GOLD GARDEN OF WALL TOWNSHIP INC., and OK SIM BAIK, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. PD NAIL CORP., CD NAIL CORP., HEE JUNG KIM and SOOK HEE KIM, Defendants-Appellants, and PD NAIL CORP., CD NAIL CORP., HEE JUNG KIM and SOOK … Weblate such answers. (Rifkind v. Superior Court (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1255, 27 Cal.Rptr.2d 822.) In that case, the court found that such questions were “unfair” at a deposition, 9 which, while true, is hardly a solid ground for a court, acting without any statutory authority, to categorically reject an earlier form of question. Rifkind’s
WebRifkind finds the asserted constitutional right in the Supreme Court's recent expressions that due process forbids the states from imposing punitive damages without judicial review of the trier of fact's assessment of them. That position was adumbrated in Pacific Mut.
WebApr 11, 2024 · A Connecticut Superior Court judge put a temporary halt last week on a decision by state utility regulators to reduce the water rates of Aquarion customers in response to the company’s request ... storage shed tifton gaWebMar 12, 2024 · Superior Court, 54 Cal.2d 318 (1960); Rifkind v. Superior Court, 22 Cal.App.4th 1255 (1960). Tellingly, the Legislature could have used the exact same language with respect to document demands under section 2031.010, et seq. But, in drafting section 2031, the Legislature chose not to include any reference to the use of “contention” style ... storage shed t handleWebRichard Rifkind, Robert S. Rifkind. Residence. Upper East Side. Education. City College of New York ( B.S.) Columbia Law School ( LL.B.) Simon Hirsch Rifkind (June 5, 1901 – November 14, 1995) was a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and trial lawyer . storage shed thresholdWebCOURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PAUL A. FIORAVANTI, JR. VICE CHANCELLOR LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER 500N. KING STREET, UITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734 April 14, 2024 Daniel A. Mason, Esquire Elizabeth Wang, Esquire Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP 500 Delaware Avenue, Suite … storage sheds zephyrhillsWebJul 28, 2024 · In Rifkind v. Superior Court (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1255, the deponent was instructed not to answer various “contention” questions. In response, the deposing party brought a motion to compel, which the court … rose bathroom rugsWebSuperior Court, supra, 117 Cal.App.3d 798, nor Rifkind v. Superior Court, supra, 123 Cal.App.3d 1045, was the information sought more than marginally relevant. However, Rifkind and Dompeling both state important principles to apply in considering disclosure of financial information. Dompeling v. rose bathroom setWebFeb 22, 1994 · Rifkind v. Superior Court 22 Cal.App.4th 1255 (1994) Cited 9 times California Court of Appeal February 22, 1994 EPSTEIN, Acting P.J.: The petitioner in this case, an attorney, was sued by another attorney for improperly withdrawing money held in a joint account pending resolution of a fee dispute between them. rose bath soak